THE BONE OF CONTENTION
IN SIERRA LEONE
(From, Nostalgia.
Josè Marìa Jones) March,2000
Sierra Leone is well
endowed with solid mineral resources such
as diamond, titanium ore , bauxite, iron ore, gold, chromate . Her
name tells her beauty. Indeed the oldest modern
state in West Africa with a constitution dating back to 1787. She was
once regarded as African oasis and a harbour
of refugees from different part of
the world.
But for ten years now
she has been a dangerous place for both her
citizens and foreigners except for the
lords of her solid mineral resources
who scramble and partition over these resources.
The war in Sierra
Leone has put to death thousands of civilians,
hundreds have their hands and legs lopped off , some abducted
and many made homeless.
It has caused great trauma
to many Sierra Leoneans since one is forced to take part
in a war one never knew the cause.One is forcefully separated from
ones family ;many especially children have been commanded to a stimulant
to the inhuman acts .Rape and kidnapping turned to be a way of life;
this make many Sierra Leoneans traumatised (Vidi: Can We Say
Aufwiedersehen to Justice ).
So, in this article I
will briefly explain the genesis of this political impasse; the;
who are the cankerworms? What is the heart of the matter;
Why did the international community especially the West
gave deaf ears to the call by Sierra Leone, various non
governmental organisations and individual persons
for help. How can a good politicking
be enthroned in Sierra Leone?
As I said earlier Sierra
Leone has been drawn into one
of the most bloody war in modern time .The
Sierra Leone government is not committed to protecting
the unarmed citizens; nor finding sanguine solution to
end this tragic episode ; the so called Revolutionary
rebel groups have been disappointment
to the people. They are no longer people's army.
Genesis of the impasse
Sierra Leone dream was the same with other
tropical Africa countries, a dream to be politically ,economically and
culturally independent from the British. A dream to build a country
where every citizen has equal right to natural resources, right
to owe a property. It was dream to be a black star. But all is a dream
lost because of corruption.
The immediate post-colonial from independence
in 1961 to 1968 was marked by a tussle for power between the two organised
political parties SLPP and APC.
In 1964 APC swept the polls in the council
elections and then show its credentials as a viable opposition
to SLPP. This success of APC at the polls was due to its radicalism, being
a trade union and working class party at a time radicalism was spreading
far across the African continent; while SLPP was dominated by the
upper and middle-class professionals, and their `traditional` allies,
the paramount chiefs.
Having made a good success in the House
of Representatives APC became altogether a different party. This
signalled the beginning of the APC consolidation of power which later
in 1978 opened way to a one-party state
There was an attempted coup d`ètat
in 1970 by Brigadier John Bangura, it was followed by that of Mohammed
Sorie Forna, for which Foday Sankoh, the future RUF leader,
was jailed. The 1973 and 1977 elections witnessed series of election
malpractice; and a year later Sierra Leone was declared a one-party
state. This created an atmosphere of violence against any form of
organised opposition or dissent, and the centralisation of power in the
hands of the party and the Pa, as President Siaka Stevens was always
referred to;( President Ahmed Tejan Kabbah is also being addressed by people,
newspapers and radio as `Pa`). This transformed state and by implication
politics into an affair for and by APC members and supporters. The one-party
politics made access to resources impossible for non-members;( there
is a revenge to this now that the SLPP controls the government, the members
see the control of national resources as a sine qua non). This is a common
post-colonial disease in most sub-Sahara Africa countries. There
is always a crisis of patrimonial in who controls these mineral resources
and in the appointment of government officials; this I think is the
root cause of political instability and dictatorship in African.
(video, unpublished, Emperior Zanza Bolingali, in Lobeda
by JM Jones, here corruption is personified in Mobutu Seseseko
of Zaire(Congo) ). The use of country or state as a personal orchard
by African leaders especially in Sierra Leone is rooted on the frequent
amendment of constitution to fit in personal goal of the President and
his ministers.
There is an element in the constitution that
grants right to a President to appoint a number citizens to
parliament. There are case where President has appointed
military, police officers and paramount chiefs to parliament. This
part of constitution gives a President an upper hand over his
oppositions , through this the country went through one party
system with little or no opposition ; men and women appointed were always
used by the presidents as sycophants and image makers.
Why is it Unopposed
One may asked why is this right
given to a President? I disagree with Mr. Patrick S Bockari of The
World wide Coalition for Peace and Development in Sierra Leone that the
citizens knew what is going on around the presidency ,but kept
quiet ``as long as that kept peace``. First colonial era
destroyed social-political-cultural values of Sub-Sahara. Our traditional
democracy was destroyed by the colonial masters .There is also a
post-colonial leadership problem as a result of crash of European
and African social values in which most African leaders found and
still find themselves in; there is also over copied of what I can
call negative part Machiavelian pragmatism among African
leaders ,a method in which being an opposition means depriving
oneself of political position, human rights and right to owe property .This
is a system Siaka Steve used to perpetual himself to power
and only translated it to General Joseph
Momoh his political son . It happened in Guinea and Cameroun
,and now what is going on in Zimbabwe will also happen to Sierra
Leone under Tejan Kabbah as he is being seen by his sycophants
as the architect of peace and protector of the so called
democracy in Sierra Leone . It is not because people
of Sierra Leone kept quiet for the sake of peace but because
greater number of population failed to speak or act because they lack education
. Many are not aware of this great error in the constitution because of
a high level of illiteracy which created lack of political
awareness, lack of knowledge of natural rights in Sierra Leone society.
Some kept quiet as long as they get favour from the government
,others fear possible assassination or imprisonment. Low level of
literacy( Sierra Leone has 85% illiteracy) contributed a lot to both
economic and political manipulation by the political class. Education
was never seen as a right of a child but a privilege. And deprivation
of education has always been used as an instrument to create a wide class
distinction in our society. Many youths, both streets youths
and students in various institutions of learning were and are
still dissatisfied with this existing social order.
So, one sees reasons for high
pullout of uneducated and street youths from the city
shanties to the forest of eastern border; from where
Sierra Leone first experienced war in 23 March, 1991; which
was launched from territory controlled by one of the factions
fighting the Liberia civil war. First, the reason for the
rebellion was to overthrow the patrimonial rule of president
Joseph Seidu Momoh and the All Peoples Congress (APC).
It must be said that most youths were captured, terrorised
and forced to joined the rebel movement. First, the rebels lack strong
political concept in order to keep up dreams and to keep off
opposition and factions as was existing in Liberia. The
rebel leaders avoided recruitment of some ``bookerties`´
University and College students many of whom want or
were planning a non blood socio-political revolution in Sierra Leone
The rebel movement of Revolutionary United Front (RUF) was first
governed by a 21 counsels who were soldiers or civilian supporters
Many young men and women from all walks of life saw
their service in the RUF as laboramus pro
patria. There had never been any successful
attempt to suppress the rebels because many
Sierra Leone soldiers supported rebels. Many soldiers
left government service in order to serve as rebels. The
reason for this is that many soldiers
were under paid or have never been promoted; and since Sankoh
paid in dollar and gave right to good soldiers
to mine diamond many soldiers and streets
youths saw reason for decampment. This move
helped RUF dream since these decamped soldiers
offered both tactical and logistic advice to
the rebels. They captured village after village getting their
living from looting, raped and abducted whomever they stumbled
upon. This gave rise to what I can call new barbarism in West
Africa. Freetown never took RUF and its`
campaign serious; it became a mosquito in government sleeping
net when it took control of some diamond
fields the main source of country revenue (op.
cit ).This affected the bourgeois whose source of income
has been cut short; secondly the country economy started to cripple
since Sierra Leone gem stone is smuggled
and sold cheap across the country, notably in Liberia.
There was also internal
political tension due to appointment of
Momoh a military general by Siaka Steven
as his successor. Momoh was overthrown by captain Valentine
Strasser who accused Momoh and his political friends
of corruption, and promised to save the country from disintegration
.
His call on the rebels
for power sharing and dialogue was rejected
; and since then the rebel group of
Revolutionary United Front under Foday Sankoh
had rejected any dialogue from Freetown.
This rejection is based on the ground of external
influences and support Sankoh has got
due to his control of diamond belt. The
diamond merchant countries like Belgium, Ukraine
and Bulgaria who exchanged weaponry and infantries
for diamond through their African agent
countries of Liberia, Burkina-Faso, Côte
d' Ivoire, Togo and Libya have boosted the
moral of the rebels by frequent supply of
arms . There are also a huge diamond trade between some Islamic
religious militias in the Mid-east and the rebel of RUF, these Islamic
religious militias trade with the government through some Lebanese living
in Sierra Leone. There are also mercenaries
from Spain, Ukraine and Libya fighting on the side of
the rebels and have access to the diamond mines.
It is reported that like in Angola
some of these mercenaries demand diamond
as a condition for accepting employment.
A British company Sandline -EO
group acts as rebels arm supplier
and at the same time is Freetown
arm supplier, tactical and logistic adviser and mines
government controls diamond mines.(see :The West
Africa, May, 1998.). Kabbah also used mercenaries
that Sandlines supplies and by this he
contravened the agreement on the U.N. Convention
Against Mercenaries, which Sierra Leone is a signatory to.
Kabbah started links with Sandline , a mining and
financial company when he was in exile in
Guinea. Sandline supported Nigeria in bringing
Kabbah back to power, and continues to support
Nigeria military operation in Sierra Leone
with it's helicopter and supply pilots
for the Nigerian Alpha Jets and Mi-24HIND gun-ship.
Just like in Congo the mercenaries intervention
in Sierra Leone has changed the course
of the civil war .It is also a
Western plan to draw neighbouring States
like Guinea, Liberia, Ivory Coast, Burkina Faso and the
Gambia into the Sierra Leone civil war in a big
way, thus regionalise the war in a
catena of the on-going debacle in the Democratic
Republic of Congo. This is because , all
these states have taken sides in a
civil war, whose outcome could have far-reaching
consequences on their own national security
concerns.
Now there is a big
border conflict between Guinea and Liberia
; Guinea has asked Sierra Leone refugees
to leave her territory this has
never happened in west African sub
region. Côte d'Ivoire used to be an
African epitome of democracy and a harbour
of peace, but things are no longer
at ease in Côte d'Ivoire; she is now
ruled by a military General Guei who may
like to transform himself to democratic president and this
move may create a serious political impasse
in that country taking Ivoiriens` socio-political behaviour
into account which Guei must take serious if there would
be peace.
Why is the war so bloody and fearful?
The war changed from social revolutionary to economic war because
of foreign interest in the diamond and arm sales. As earlier
stated many countries in Europe and individual groups within Africa
and outside have interest in Sierra Leone, just as they have in Congo
Kinshasa and Angola. The end of Cold War saw Africa as arm
dumping ground and it is a pity that Africans are
agents to this. When some youths from Sea Tiger of Freetown
informed the Sierra Leone police and Ecomog of
high involvement of Liberian officials in diamond trade with the
rebels, and the rebels plan to attack Freetown using the creeks
,they were beating ,and detained and accused of being
rebel informants. To them the accusation is false since a head
of state is involved; but recent findings by international human
rights have pointed Liberia as trading corridor for Sierra
Leone diamond and for smuggling in weaponry
and infantries. The Togolese president and the
current chairman of organisation of
African Unity (OAU) Monsieur Eyadèma
has been recently accused of double
dealings; he is a big contractor of arms
from Asia and South Africa to
both Sierra Leone and Angola rebels. Lome
is used as a distributing centre for
arms to rebels of Sierra Leone and Angola; at the
same time chaired the 9th July ,1999
failed peace accord in Lome the Togolese
capital city. Burkina Faso and Libya are
not out of the boiling pot; Burkinabes are known
to be fighting as mercenaries in Sierra Leone ;
Foday Sankoh received his military
training , tactical and logistic support
from Libya .Diamond is used to
pay for the services from these countries.
It has been reported that countries
like Liberia and Côte d'Ivoire have exported
large amount of gem stone which are Sierra
Leone origin.
The recent findings report
that Liberia with an average annual mining
capacity of 100,000 to 150,000 carats, but according
to the Hoge Raad voor Diamant (HRD)
in Antwerp recorded Liberian imports into
Belgium of more than 31 million carats
between 1994 to 1998—an average of over 6
million carats a year. The same report has it
that Côte dÌvoire exported an average
of more than 1.5 million carats to
Belgium each year between 1995 and
1997, even though Côte dÍvoire´s small
diamond mining industry was closed in
the mid-1980; while the government of Sierra
Leone exports recorded a mere 8,500 carats
in 1998, whereas the HRD registered imports
of 770,000carats in that year. It is also
believed that if De Beers which purchases
by far the majority of diamond produced, should
stop to purchase large amount of diamond
from countries with a negligible production
base , much could be done to end the
current high level of smuggling. (see: Sierra
Leone Diamond and Human Security, published. by the
Partnership Africa Canada, and by Ian Smillie,
Lansana Gberie and Ralph Hazleton.)
It is therefore right to
say that what is happening in Sierra Leone
is a war on who controls the
diamond mines; and the west is not
interested in finding solution to this
conflict because the major victims are
the less privileged in the society .The
conflict makes the west especially the NATO
countries to prosper through low purchase
price of the Sierra Leone gem stone and sale
of arms to both the rebels and the
government. The British arm sale to Sierra Leone has increased
recently in order to keep Kabbah in power while hundreds of children
are being killed or mutilated by both the Sierra Leone soldiers and
the rebel groups. The high influence of diamond
and arm industries in Europe may be a reason for
little or no media report on
Sierra Leone at the conflict's apex
in December, 1998. That may also be reason that no
NATO country is taking part in the
U:N. peace mission (UNASIMIL) in Sierra Leone.
The twelve thousand U.N O. peace keeping
soldiers in Sierra Leone are drawn
from the Non- alien countries --the so called
third world countries. West Africa countries contributed largely
to the UNO peace mission in Bosnia
and Herzegovina, East Timor, in the Mid -east .Africa
countries have been known for their contribution to world peace
by their moral and financial support; and substantially
contributed to the U.N.O military monitoring
operation wherever the need arises.. U.N.O. nonchalant (non
commitment) attitude in African crisis may be seen
from the fact that the U.N.O security council
is controlled by arms manufacturing countries who
see Africa after the end of the Cold Wars era as
a new area for arms dumping.
To end the current political
impasse in Sierra Leone there is need for the participation
of the NATO countries in the U.N.O. peace keeping mission
in Sierra Leone. Britain as a former colonial master should be fully
involved . There is urgent need to ask Tejah Kabbah to step
down and a new interim government formed, this would usher in a genuine
peace; and this will give room to an election for a truly elected
president. Diamond industries especially De Beers
should be encouraged to stop purchase of
diamond from countries with a negligible
production base; and close purchasing agencies
in Liberia and Côte d´Ivoire
until origin of diamond is certified
so as to end the current high level of smuggling. This measure
if taken would go long way in ending
Sierra Leone armed conflict , its` highly criminal, and
economy war fuelled by diamond. |